11/19/2023 0 Comments Sleep no more imdbI just wish we could have seen a second part tp tie up those loose ends. I would even say it's probably a personal best for writer Mark Gatiss (take that as you will). That being said, the episode is still a fun thrill ride with interesting characters and twists, and definitely does not deserve all the hate it gets. What happens on Triton? Assuming The Doctor does indeed destroy all of Morpheus, how is that accomplished? How does he cure Clara and Nagata? What eventually happens to Rasmussen and the Sandmen? What happens with the video that will supposedly spread the Sandmen? We never find out and I suppose the episode is trying to be clever by not answering these questions, which beg for a second part that never comes. Oscars Emmys TIFF STARmeter Awards Awards Central Festival Central All Events. What to Watch Latest Trailers IMDb Originals IMDb Picks IMDb Podcasts. The episode almost appears to be setting up for a second part due to some of the loose ends, (definitely more so and in a better way than "The Girl Who Died" set up for "The Woman Who Lived"), but unfortunately never delivers. Sleep No More (2020) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more. The purpose of the Sandmen, the found footage style cinematography (which I'm not usually overly fond of, but manages to work for the episode), the character of Rasmussen (the only "survivor" of the original crew and scientist who invented the Morpheus sleep pods causing all the problems), are all interwoven in an interesting but overly complicated way, which Rasmussen's twist explanation at the end does little to clear things up and doesn't give the remaining characters nor the audience the chance to truly assimilate his revelations. The episode definitely has some loose ends, and while the plot is fairly straightforward on the surface, it gets a bit convoluted by the end. Which brings me to the structure of the episode. And I was glad that Nagata did manage to survive in the end. I was sufficiently attached to these characters, that Their deaths, while technically throwaway in tried and true horror fashion, still makes me wish they could have survived. The characters are decently developed, especially Nagata, the female captain of the ill-fated rescue team. And, dare I say it, this episode is actually well written - by Mark Gatiss, no less, which is a pleasant surprise, considering my general opinion of his writing for Doctor Who. But it's done in such a fun and thrilling way, I really don't mind. As I said, very Sci-Fi channel, and the episode doesn't seem to have much to say (other than "sleep is good"), which is a typical weakness in the writings of Mark Gatiss. Yes, the premise is a little ridiculous-sleep basically keeps the "sleep dust" in the corner of your eye from digesting you and turning you into a "Sandman," as Clara and The Doctor call them, which are basically giant booger people. It's fun and thrilling in a Sci-Fi channel B movie sort of way. It's as simple as that.This is one of the most hated episodes in all of Doctor Who, but for the life of me I cannot figure out why. Savile was never punished for his crimes. In any case, Davies acknowledges in his book that Savile was never going to reveal the secrets that he had guarded so closely for decades so why rewrite history? The real truth is there was no reckoning. Firstly, Savile died in bed in his sleep but, far more importantly, Davies last met Savile nearly two years before his death and this fact completely contradicts what the viewer has been told and ultimately undermines what the programme was hoping to achieve. Savile has died and his lifeless body is shown slumped in an armchair next to the phone as Davies leaves a voice message. Davies calls Savile to arrange the meeting but there's no answer. The credits state that one of the key sources was Dan Davies' book In Plain Sight: The Life and Lies of Jimmy Savile and we see Davies questioning Savile (in a far more confrontational and persistent way than is described in his book) to the point where Savile eventually agrees to tell Davies everything at their next meeting. The problem is that this is almost entirely fictional. The final episode is the weakest of the four as it feels like a contrived attempt to reassure the audience that Savile ultimately suffered in some small way for his crimes through an increasing fear that the walls were closing in on him and that he may be exposed at any moment. Coogan gives an excellent performance, but it was perhaps inevitable that The Reckoning could not really add anything that was both new and factual (see below) given the enormous publicity surrounding the sexual abuse scandal that began less than a year after Savile's death. This BBC drama handles a difficult and extremely unpleasant story in a sensitive way that neither dwells upon nor sensationalises Savile's crimes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |